Investigating the effect of discordant clinical and pathological diagnoses of complicated appendicitis on clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Following appendectomy, management is often guided by surgeon determination of whether the appendicitis is uncomplicated or complicated. Our objectives were to determine the incidence of discordance between intraoperative and pathological findings and determine effect on outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective five-year cohort analysis of adults who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Outcomes examined were length of stay (LOS), return to ED, and 30-day readmission. We reported p-values from logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 1479 cases, 36.4% were labeled complicated appendicitis, among which, 58.2% were discordant. When intraoperative findings underestimated pathological findings, there was a decreased LOS (p < 0.001) compared to concordant diagnoses. There was no significant difference for readmission (p = 0.592) or ED (p = 0.857).

CONCLUSION

Operative underestimation of appendicitis severity was associated with a shorter LOS. Discordance did not adversely affect hospital readmission or rate of return to ED. These findings suggest reliance on intraoperative findings is sufficient in guiding management.

SUMMARY: We wanted determine the incidence of discordance between operative and pathological findings and determine effect on outcomes. Operative underestimation of appendicitis severity was associated with a shorter LOS. Discordance did not adversely affect hospital readmission or rate of return to ED. These findings suggest reliance on intraoperative findings is sufficient in guiding management.