MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11934-024-01239-z

Медицинская библиотека · Current urology reports · 2024

Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review.

Naik Noopur, Roth Bradley, Lundy Scott D

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infertility impacts one in six couples worldwide, with male infertility contributing to approximately half of these cases. However, the causes of infertility remain incompletely understood, and current methods of clinical management are cost-restrictive, time-intensive, and have limited success. Artificial intelligence (AI) may help address some of these challenges. In this review, we synthesize recent literature in AI with implications for the clinical management of male infertility.

RECENT FINDINGS: Artificial intelligence may offer opportunities for proactive, cost-effective, and efficient management of male infertility, specifically in the areas of hypogonadism, semen analysis, and interventions such as assisted reproductive technology. Patients may benefit from the integration of AI into a male infertility specialist's clinical workflow. The ability of AI to integrate large volumes of data into predictive models could help clinicians guide conversations with patients on the value of various treatment options in infertility, but caution must be taken to ensure the quality of care being delivered remains high.

Для цитирования: Naik Noopur, Roth Bradley, Lundy Scott D. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review.. Current urology reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01239-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.