MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bjs.5394

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of surgery · 2006

Intra-anal collagen injection for the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Stojkovic S G, Lim M, Burke D, Finan P J, Sagar P M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intra-anal injectable agents have been used to treat faecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to report the experience of a cohort of patients who underwent intra-anal injection of collagen and to determine which patients benefited from the technique.

METHODS

Data, including age, sex, incontinence score, classification of incontinence, baseline resting pressure and vector volume, were collected prospectively for 73 consecutive patients (59 women) undergoing intra-anal collagen injection. Patients were reviewed after treatment and incontinence scores documented. A proportion of patients also underwent repeat anorectal physiological testing 8 weeks after the procedure.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 12 months after the intra-anal injection, 63 per cent of patients had an improved incontinence score and 73 per cent reported an overall improvement in symptoms. Logistic regression showed that older age and idiopathic faecal incontinence were predictors of a successful outcome (P = 0.042 and P = 0.048 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Intra-anal collagen injection appears to have a role in the treatment of faecal incontinence. The majority of patients can expect both objective and subjective improvement. The best results are achieved in older patients and in those with idiopathic incontinence.

Для цитирования: Stojkovic S G, Lim M, Burke D, Finan P J, Sagar P M. Intra-anal collagen injection for the treatment of faecal incontinence.. The British journal of surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5394.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.