MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100281

Медицинская библиотека · Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023

Desmopressin in nonsevere hemophilia A: patient perspectives on use and efficacy.

Romano Lorenzo G R, van Vulpen Lize F D, den Exter Paul L, Heubel-Moenen Floor C J I, Hooijmeijer Helene L, Coppens Michiel, Fijnvandraat Karin, Schols Saskia E M, Ypma Paula F, Smit Cees, Driessens Mariëtte H E, Rosendaal Frits R, van der Bom Johanna G, Gouw Samantha C, Kruip Marieke J H A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Desmopressin increases plasma factor VIII and von Willebrand factor levels in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Patients' perspectives on desmopressin are relevant to increase and optimize its suboptimal use. However, patients' views on desmopressin are not reported.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the perspectives of persons with nonsevere hemophilia A on desmopressin use, barriers for its use, side effects, and their knowledge about desmopressin's efficacy and side effects.

METHODS

Persons with nonsevere hemophilia A were included in a cross-sectional, national, multicenter study. Questionnaires were filled out by adult patients and children aged ≥12 years themselves. Caretakers filled out questionnaires for children aged <12 years.

RESULTS

In total, 706 persons with nonsevere hemophilia A were included (544 mild, 162 moderate, [age range, 0-88 years]). Of 508 patients, 234 (50%) patients reported previous desmopressin use. Desmopressin was considered as at least moderately effective in 171 of 187 (90%) patients. Intranasal administration was the modality of choice for 138 of 182 (76%) patients. Flushing was the most reported side effect in 54 of 206 (26%) adults and 7 of 22 (32%) children. The most frequently reported advantage and disadvantage were the convenience of intranasal, out-of-hospital administration by 56% (126/227) and side effects in 18% (41/227), respectively. Patients' self-perceived knowledge was unsatisfactory or unknown in 28% (63/225).

CONCLUSION

Overall, desmopressin was most often used intranasally and considered effective, with flushing as the most common side effect. The most mentioned advantage was the convenience of intranasal administration and disadvantage was side effects. More information and education on desmopressin could answer unmet needs in patients with current or future desmopressin treatment.

Для цитирования: Romano Lorenzo G R, van Vulpen Lize F D, den Exter Paul L, Heubel-Moenen Floor C J I, Hooijmeijer Helene L, Coppens Michiel, Fijnvandraat Karin, Schols Saskia E M, Ypma Paula F, Smit Cees, Driessens Mariëtte H E, Rosendaal Frits R, van der Bom Johanna G, Gouw Samantha C, Kruip Marieke J H A. Desmopressin in nonsevere hemophilia A: patient perspectives on use and efficacy.. Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100281.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.