MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/2333794x241273300

Медицинская библиотека · Global pediatric health · 2024

Determining Consensus Alignment and Barriers of Neonatal Thermal Management in Nepal Using a Modified Delphi Process.

Tomlin Brandon, Lamichhane Bibec, Dhungana Ranjan, Richards Grace, Grubb Peter, Mahato Anamika, Fassl Bernhard, Judkins Allison

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objective. Neonatal hypothermia is a worldwide health burden with an incidence ranging from 32% to 85% in hospitals and 11% to 92% in homebirths. It is prevalent in Nepal and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The study objective was to identify key practice standards of newborn thermal management in Nepal. Methods. Our subjects included 6 lead newborn physicians from major birthing centers in Kathmandu. A modified Delphi process was used to identify the top 5 key practice standards for newborn thermoregulation in the hospital, health post, and home, compiled from 14 World Health Organization recommended practices. Results. There was consensus in all ranked practices except using radiant heat sources in the hospital and performing Kangaroo Mother Care in the homebirths. Comments conveyed that interventions during the immediate delivery phase were most impactful and feasible. Conclusion. Nepali physicians prioritized thermoregulatory practices during the immediate resuscitation period over the post-resuscitation period.

Для цитирования: Tomlin Brandon, Lamichhane Bibec, Dhungana Ranjan, Richards Grace, Grubb Peter, Mahato Anamika, Fassl Bernhard, Judkins Allison. Determining Consensus Alignment and Barriers of Neonatal Thermal Management in Nepal Using a Modified Delphi Process.. Global pediatric health. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/2333794x241273300.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.