MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70015-3

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1999

Antenatal testing among 1001 patients at high risk: the role of ultrasonographic estimate of amniotic fluid volume.

Magann E F, Chauhan S P, Kinsella M J, McNamara M F, Whitworth N S, Morrison J C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to compare the accuracy of the amniotic fluid index and the 2-diameter pocket technique with respect to accuracy in predicting an adverse pregnancy outcome among patients at high risk undergoing antenatal testing.

STUDY

DESIGN

All women with high-risk pregnancies and intact membranes who underwent antenatal testing during an 18-month period were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasonographic estimates of amniotic fluid volume were performed by means of the amniotic fluid index and the 2-diameter pocket technique. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals and receiver operator characteristic curves were calculated for patients with an ultrasonographic estimate of oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index of </=5 cm or 2-diameter pocket of </=15 cm2) versus normal fluid level (amniotic fluid index of >5 cm or 2-diameter pocket of >15 cm2). Outcome variables studied were intrapartum and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

Among 1001 patients the mean (+/-SD) amniotic fluid index was 10.5 +/- 5 cm and the mean (+/-SD) 2-diameter pocket was 18.7 +/- 13.6 cm2. Significantly more patients (46%) were considered to have oligohydramnios according to the 2-diameter pocket criteria than according to the amniotic fluid index (21%, P <.0001, relative risk 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-1.8). No significant differences in the incidences of nonreactive nonstress test results, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, cesarean delivery for fetal distress, low Apgar scores, or infants with cord pH of <7.10 were observed between the oligohydramnios and normal amniotic fluid groups (P >.05) when assessed by relative risk with confidence interval and by receiver operator characteristic curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Current ultrasonographic measurements with the amniotic fluid index and the 2-diameter pocket technique are poor diagnostic tests to determine whether a patient is at high risk for an adverse perinatal outcome.

Для цитирования: Magann E F, Chauhan S P, Kinsella M J, McNamara M F, Whitworth N S, Morrison J C. Antenatal testing among 1001 patients at high risk: the role of ultrasonographic estimate of amniotic fluid volume.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1999. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70015-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.