DOI 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04735.x
Inhibitory effect of local anaesthetics on reactive oxygen species production by human neutrophils.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from neutrophils accumulated in various major organs are thought to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of host auto-injury. Lidocaine has been shown to reduce the injury. We investigated the effect of local anaesthetics (lidocaine, mepivacaine and bupivacaine) on ROS production by neutrophils using an in vitro system.
METHODS
We measured the production of superoxide (ferricytochrome c method), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2: scopoletin fluorescence technique), and hydroxyl radical (OH.: ethylene gas method) by neutrophils isolated from human adult volunteers in the absence and presence of lidocaine (2-200 micrograms/mL), mepivacaine (3-300 micrograms/mL), and bupivacaine (3-300 micrograms/mL). We also measured the ROS generation in a cell-free (xanthine-xanthine oxidase) system.
RESULTS
Lidocaine and mepivacaine at higher levels significantly decreased the production of ROS by neutrophils. However, these local anaesthetics at clinically relevant blood concentrations had no effect on the levels of ROS. Furthermore, lidocaine and mepivacaine failed to reduce ROS generated by the cell-free system. Bupivacaine did not decrease ROS generation by either generating system.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, in the present in vitro system, only concentrations of lidocaine and mepivacaine 100-fold higher than clinically feasible ones reduced ROS production by human neutrophils. However, the local anaesthetics at clinically relevant blood concentrations had no suppressive effect. Further studies using in vivo systems are required to elucidate the inhibitory effects of local anaesthetics on ROS generation in clinical settings.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.