Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica · 2001
The effect of early steroid treatment after PRK on clinical and refractive outcomes.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vetrugno M, Maino A, Quaranta G M, Cardia L
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of steroid treatment administered in the first days after excimer laser keratectomy (PRK) on re-epithelialization time, postoperative pain, haze and refractive outcome.
METHODS: A randomised, double masked trial was carried out on two groups of patients (40 patients each), who underwent PRK. Group A (steroid group) received 0.1% fluorometholone acetate whereas group B (NSAID group) received 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine until re-epithelialization was completed. Subsequently, all 80 patients received the same steroid treatment: 0.1%, fluorometholone acetate for myopic corrections up to -5 D, or dexamethasone for myopic corrections exceeding -5 D. Both drugs were tapered off over approximately 3 months. Follow-up examinations were planned at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Re-epithelialization was completed after three days, without any significant difference between groups. A higher hyperopic shift was shown in the steroid group and a more severe regression was reported in the NSAID group (p<0.001). Haze was significantly reduced in the steroid group (p=0.005), especially for myopic corrections over -5 D (p=0.015). Pain was significantly reduced in the NSAID group (p=0.002).
CONCLUSION: Steroid eyedrops administered in the first days after PRK did not affect re-epithelialization time. Moreover, a modulation of the inflammatory response in this period appears to reduce haze and myopic regression in high myopic patients.
METHODS: A randomised, double masked trial was carried out on two groups of patients (40 patients each), who underwent PRK. Group A (steroid group) received 0.1% fluorometholone acetate whereas group B (NSAID group) received 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine until re-epithelialization was completed. Subsequently, all 80 patients received the same steroid treatment: 0.1%, fluorometholone acetate for myopic corrections up to -5 D, or dexamethasone for myopic corrections exceeding -5 D. Both drugs were tapered off over approximately 3 months. Follow-up examinations were planned at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Re-epithelialization was completed after three days, without any significant difference between groups. A higher hyperopic shift was shown in the steroid group and a more severe regression was reported in the NSAID group (p<0.001). Haze was significantly reduced in the steroid group (p=0.005), especially for myopic corrections over -5 D (p=0.015). Pain was significantly reduced in the NSAID group (p=0.002).
CONCLUSION: Steroid eyedrops administered in the first days after PRK did not affect re-epithelialization time. Moreover, a modulation of the inflammatory response in this period appears to reduce haze and myopic regression in high myopic patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCorneaDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodEpithelium, CornealFemaleFluorometholoneHumansKetorolac TromethamineLasers, ExcimerMaleMyopiaOphthalmic SolutionsPostoperative PainPhotorefractive KeratectomyRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityWound Healing