British dental journal · 1997
The efficacy of local anaesthetics administered by general dental practitioners.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matthews R, Ball R, Goodley A, Lenton J, Riley C, Sanderson S, Singleton E
Аннотация
AIM: To obtain empirical evidence for the efficacy of local anaesthesia in dentistry.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of serial administrations of local anaesthesia.
METHODS: Dentist and patient evaluations of the success of differing techniques (infiltration and block) of anaesthesia in a variety of general practice procedures. Results were analysed for correlation between dentist and patient using a 5-point scale.
RESULTS: Complete data were analysed for 331 administrations. In the hands of experienced dentists over 93% of operations were assessed by both dentist and patient as comfortable or completely comfortable. Dentists were generally able to judge patient comfort (P < 0.001). Administrations requiring repeat injections were less comfortable. Dentists judged infiltration administrations more comfortable than block administrations (P < 0.001), but patient judgements of comfort failed to distinguish between differing techniques at the P < 0.05 level.
CONCLUSIONS: Some variations in success rate exist between dentists the most dental procedures under local anaesthetic in general practice were assessed as being comfortable or better by both dentists and patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of serial administrations of local anaesthesia.
METHODS: Dentist and patient evaluations of the success of differing techniques (infiltration and block) of anaesthesia in a variety of general practice procedures. Results were analysed for correlation between dentist and patient using a 5-point scale.
RESULTS: Complete data were analysed for 331 administrations. In the hands of experienced dentists over 93% of operations were assessed by both dentist and patient as comfortable or completely comfortable. Dentists were generally able to judge patient comfort (P < 0.001). Administrations requiring repeat injections were less comfortable. Dentists judged infiltration administrations more comfortable than block administrations (P < 0.001), but patient judgements of comfort failed to distinguish between differing techniques at the P < 0.05 level.
CONCLUSIONS: Some variations in success rate exist between dentists the most dental procedures under local anaesthetic in general practice were assessed as being comfortable or better by both dentists and patients.