Sexually transmitted diseases · 2023
Ten Years of Disseminated Gonococcal Infections in North Carolina: A Review of Cases From a Large Tertiary Care Hospital.
ОбзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sciaudone Michael, Cope Anna, Mobley Victoria, Samoff Erika, Seña Arlene C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The detection and reporting of disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI) has been increasing across the United States.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of DGI case-patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 at a large tertiary care hospital in North Carolina.
RESULTS: We identified 12 DGI case-patients (7 men and 5 women, aged 20 to 44 years), of whom 5 had Neisseria gonorrheae isolated from a sterile site (confirmed), 2 had N. gonorrheae detected at a nonsterile mucosal site and had clinical manifestations consistent with DGI (probable), and 5 did not have N. gonorrheae isolated from any site, but DGI was the most likely diagnosis (suspect). Among the 12 DGI case-patients, the most common manifestation was arthritis or tenosynovitis (n = 11); 1 patient had endocarditis. Half of the patients had significant underlying comorbidities or predisposing factors, including complement deficiency. Eleven of the 12 case-patients were hospitalized, and 4 required surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights the difficulty of making a definitive diagnosis of DGI, which could negatively affect reporting to public health authorities and hinder surveillance efforts to determine the true prevalence of DGI. A high index of suspicion is required, and a full diagnostic workup should be pursued in all cases of suspected DGI.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of DGI case-patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 at a large tertiary care hospital in North Carolina.
RESULTS: We identified 12 DGI case-patients (7 men and 5 women, aged 20 to 44 years), of whom 5 had Neisseria gonorrheae isolated from a sterile site (confirmed), 2 had N. gonorrheae detected at a nonsterile mucosal site and had clinical manifestations consistent with DGI (probable), and 5 did not have N. gonorrheae isolated from any site, but DGI was the most likely diagnosis (suspect). Among the 12 DGI case-patients, the most common manifestation was arthritis or tenosynovitis (n = 11); 1 patient had endocarditis. Half of the patients had significant underlying comorbidities or predisposing factors, including complement deficiency. Eleven of the 12 case-patients were hospitalized, and 4 required surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights the difficulty of making a definitive diagnosis of DGI, which could negatively affect reporting to public health authorities and hinder surveillance efforts to determine the true prevalence of DGI. A high index of suspicion is required, and a full diagnostic workup should be pursued in all cases of suspected DGI.