The Journal of trauma · 2011
The medial sural artery perforator flap: a versatile donor site for hand reconstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Cheng-Hung, Lin Chih-Hung, Lin Yu-Te, Hsu Chung-Chen, Ng Timothy W, Wei Fu-Chan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The challenge of modern hand reconstruction goes beyond simple coverage. Thanks to the advances of microsurgery, there are ever-improving standards of functional and esthetic outcomes in hand reconstruction. The versatile donor site of the medial sural artery perforator flap can fulfill this purpose.
MATERIALS: Between June 2006 and October 2008, we used free medial sural artery perforator flaps for hand reconstruction in 14 cases. The sites of reconstruction included digits (n=7), dorsal hand (n=3), palmar hand (n=2), and wrist (n=2). Associated tendon and nerve defects were found in five patients. The plantaris tendon (n=4), split Achilles tendon (n=1), saphenous nerve (n=1), and sural nerve (n=1) were harvested for reconstructive purpose from the same donor site in this series.
RESULTS: The proximal perforator of the medial sural artery emerged 8 cm to 13 cm from the midpoint of the popliteal crease, correlating with the axis of the medial sural artery. Twelve flaps were raised with a single perforator. One flap failed because of perioperative vasospasm. The donor defect could be closed without skin grafts when the flap width was <6 cm.
CONCLUSION: The free medial sural artery perforator flap transfer is appropriate for small- to medium-sized hand defect reconstruction. The donor site not only supplies a thin fasciocutaneous flap but also provides the option to harvest a segment of tendon or nerve graft through the same incision for composite tissue reconstruction in a single stage.
MATERIALS: Between June 2006 and October 2008, we used free medial sural artery perforator flaps for hand reconstruction in 14 cases. The sites of reconstruction included digits (n=7), dorsal hand (n=3), palmar hand (n=2), and wrist (n=2). Associated tendon and nerve defects were found in five patients. The plantaris tendon (n=4), split Achilles tendon (n=1), saphenous nerve (n=1), and sural nerve (n=1) were harvested for reconstructive purpose from the same donor site in this series.
RESULTS: The proximal perforator of the medial sural artery emerged 8 cm to 13 cm from the midpoint of the popliteal crease, correlating with the axis of the medial sural artery. Twelve flaps were raised with a single perforator. One flap failed because of perioperative vasospasm. The donor defect could be closed without skin grafts when the flap width was <6 cm.
CONCLUSION: The free medial sural artery perforator flap transfer is appropriate for small- to medium-sized hand defect reconstruction. The donor site not only supplies a thin fasciocutaneous flap but also provides the option to harvest a segment of tendon or nerve graft through the same incision for composite tissue reconstruction in a single stage.