MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/02688697.2010.495169

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of neurosurgery · 2010

Continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in pseudotumour cerebri: Single centre experience.

Toma Ahmed K, Tarnaris Andrew, Kitchen Neil D, Watkins Laurence D

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Investigating pseudotumour cerebri (PTC) patients who do not fulfil the diagnostic criteria, or those presenting post-shunt insertion with recurrent symptoms and signs, with no clear evidence of shunt malfunction, present a diagnostic challenge. PTC patients who underwent continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in our unit were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-six ICP monitoring procedures were done on 20 patients. Eleven patients had normal pressure, 2 overdrainage/low pressure, 11 underdrainage/high pressure and 2 variable pressures. On the basis of these results 12 patients were managed conservatively: 11 patients were referred to headache team and 1 patient had readjustment of an adjustable valve shunt setting; of those 3 patients had improved symptoms on their first post-operative clinic review. On the other hand, 14 patients had surgery: 5 had shunt revision and 9 had shunt insertion; of those 5 patients improved.

CONCLUSION

ICP monitoring using an intraparenchymal probe is a safe and effective diagnostic technique in investigating PTC when indicated. A multidisciplinary approach achieves best results in terms of successful management and follow-up.

Для цитирования: Toma Ahmed K, Tarnaris Andrew, Kitchen Neil D, Watkins Laurence D. Continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in pseudotumour cerebri: Single centre experience.. British journal of neurosurgery. 2010. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2010.495169.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.