DOI 10.1007/s00216-023-04722-7
Detection, chemical analysis, and pharmacological characterization of dipyanone and other new synthetic opioids related to prescription drugs.
Аннотация
The emergence of structurally diverse new synthetic opioids (NSOs) has caused the opioid crisis to spiral to new depths. Little information is available about the pharmacology of most novel opioids when they first emerge. Here, using a β-arrestin 2 recruitment assay, we investigated the in vitro μ-opioid receptor (MOR) activation potential of dipyanone, desmethylmoramide, and acetoxymethylketobemidone (O-AMKD) - recent NSOs that are structurally related to the prescription opioids methadone and ketobemidone. Our findings indicate that dipyanone (EC50=39.9 nM; Emax=155% vs. hydromorphone) is about equally active as methadone (EC50=50.3 nM; Emax=152%), whereas desmethylmoramide (EC50=1335 nM; Emax=126%) is considerably less active. A close structural analogue of ketobemidone (EC50=134 nM; Emax=156%) and methylketobemidone (EC50=335 nM; Emax=117%), O-AMKD showed a lower potency (EC50=1262 nM) and efficacy (Emax=109%). Evaluation of the opioid substitution product buprenorphine and its metabolite norbuprenorphine confirmed the increased in vitro efficacy of the latter. In addition to in vitro characterization, this report details the first identification and full chemical analysis of dipyanone in a seized powder, as well as a postmortem toxicology case from the USA involving the drug. Dipyanone was quantified in blood (370 ng/mL), in which it was detected alongside other NSOs (e.g., 2-methyl AP-237) and novel benzodiazepines (e.g., flualprazolam). While dipyanone is currently not commonly encountered in forensic samples worldwide, its emergence is worrisome and representative of the dynamic NSO market. Graphical Abstract.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.