Injury · 2013
External fixator followed by a plate for distraction, reduction, and fixation in neglected femoral diaphyseal fractures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Chongfei, Wang Huayi, Zhu Qingsheng, Zhu Jinyu
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the outcome of a two-stage surgery in the treatment of neglected femoral diaphyseal fractures which are not uncommon in developing nations.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with neglected or late-presenting femoral diaphyseal fractures were considered in this study. All patients underwent a two-stage surgery, which consisted of distraction by an external fixator and open reduction by internal plate fixation. All patients received a supervised regimen of physiotherapy. Patients were followed up clinically and with radiographs at 2 months to assess union and at monthly intervals thereafter.
RESULTS: All patients achieved bony union in an average of 3.7 months (2-6 months) with no one lost follow-up. Seven patients regained full range of motion, and the mean knee range of motion was 139.5°. No wound related or neurovascular complications were detected. One patient with stiff knee was re-admitted 1 year after surgery for metal removal, arthrolysis and quadricepsplasty for improving knee range of motion to 90° flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the treating of neglected femoral diaphyseal fractures with a two-stage surgery is a satisfactory therapy showing reliable bony union, however continuing medical education is necessary for physicians in primary medical facilities as well as for patients with traditional views.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with neglected or late-presenting femoral diaphyseal fractures were considered in this study. All patients underwent a two-stage surgery, which consisted of distraction by an external fixator and open reduction by internal plate fixation. All patients received a supervised regimen of physiotherapy. Patients were followed up clinically and with radiographs at 2 months to assess union and at monthly intervals thereafter.
RESULTS: All patients achieved bony union in an average of 3.7 months (2-6 months) with no one lost follow-up. Seven patients regained full range of motion, and the mean knee range of motion was 139.5°. No wound related or neurovascular complications were detected. One patient with stiff knee was re-admitted 1 year after surgery for metal removal, arthrolysis and quadricepsplasty for improving knee range of motion to 90° flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the treating of neglected femoral diaphyseal fractures with a two-stage surgery is a satisfactory therapy showing reliable bony union, however continuing medical education is necessary for physicians in primary medical facilities as well as for patients with traditional views.