MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2024.3.focus2425

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgical focus · 2024

Ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, dentatorubrothalamic tract, and caudal zona incerta: stimulation of which structure provides ongoing tremor control in patients with essential tremor?

Remore Luigi G, Rifi Ziad, Tsolaki Evangelia, Ward Michael J, Wei Wenxin, Tolossa Meskerem, Locatelli Marco, Bari Ausaf A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is known to improve symptoms in patients with medication-resistant ET. However, the clinical effectiveness of VIM-DBS may vary, and other targets have been proposed. The authors aimed to investigate whether the same anatomical structure is responsible for tremor control both immediately after VIM-DBS and at later follow-up evaluations.

METHODS

Of 68 electrodes from 41 patients with ET, the authors mapped the distances of the active contact from the VIM, the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT), and the caudal zona incerta (cZI) and compared them using Friedman's ANOVA and the Wilcoxon signed-rank follow-up test. The same distances were also compared between the initially planned target and the final implantation site after intraoperative macrostimulation. Finally, the comparison among the three structures was repeated for 16 electrodes whose active contact was changed after a mean 37.5 months follow-up to improve tremor control.

RESULTS

After lead implantation, the VIM was statistically significantly closer to the active contact than both the DRTT (p = 0.008) and cZI (p < 0.001). This result did not change if the target was moved based on intraoperative macrostimulation. At the last follow-up, the active contact distance from the VIM was always significantly less than that of the cZI (p < 0.001), but the distance from the DRTT was reduced and even less than the distance from the VIM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving VIM-DBS, the VIM itself is the structure driving the anti-tremor effect and remains more effective than the cZI, even years after implantation. Nevertheless, the role of the DRTT may become more important over time and may help sustain the clinical efficacy when the habituation from the VIM stimulation ensues.

Для цитирования: Remore Luigi G, Rifi Ziad, Tsolaki Evangelia, Ward Michael J, Wei Wenxin, Tolossa Meskerem, Locatelli Marco, Bari Ausaf A. Ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, dentatorubrothalamic tract, and caudal zona incerta: stimulation of which structure provides ongoing tremor control in patients with essential tremor?. Neurosurgical focus. 2024. DOI: 10.3171/2024.3.focus2425.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.