MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.010

Медицинская библиотека · Revista chilena de pediatria · 2016

[A case of partial 1p36.1 deletion and partial trisomy 6p diagnosed by karyotype].

Fernández Pineda Monica, Ramírez-Cheyne Julián, Isaza Carolina, Saldarriaga Wilmar

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The deletion of chromosomal region 1p36 is one of the most common sub-telomeric microdeletion syndromes and has distinctive dysmorphic features. On the other hand, partial trisomy of the short arm of chromosome 6 is a rare chromosomal abnormality with a variable phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To report a case with both chromosome abnormalities, and to highlight the importance of the karyotype as a diagnostic tool in dysmorphology.

CLINICAL CASE: The case of is presented of a two month-old infant with several craniofacial anomalies, neck haemangioma, sacral pit, rhizomelic shortening, small hands and feet, left unilateral cryptorchidism, and hypotonia. The infant also suffered intrauterine growth restriction and is the product of the eighth pregnancy of a 28 years old woman. Due to the unspecific findings in phenotype, a karyotype was requested, which showed a partial deletion of 1p36.1 and a partial trisomy of chromosome 6.

CONCLUSION

The development of new techniques in molecular biology has improved diagnostic possibilities in medical genetics. However, the traditional karyotype remains as an important diagnostic tool in patients with multiple congenital anomalies.

Для цитирования: Fernández Pineda Monica, Ramírez-Cheyne Julián, Isaza Carolina, Saldarriaga Wilmar. [A case of partial 1p36.1 deletion and partial trisomy 6p diagnosed by karyotype].. Revista chilena de pediatria. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.04.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.