MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.125.042249

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025

Phase-Specific Hemodynamic Criteria and Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices.

Ikeda Yuki, Saku Keita, Nakata Jun, Unoki Takashi, Yamamoto Takeshi, Sakamoto Tomohiro, Ako Junya, UNLOADERS‐PVAD Investigators

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Standardized protocols with optimal hemodynamic targets for percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) management remain undefined. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of phase-specific hemodynamic criteria achieved during PVAD support and their association with outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock requiring PVAD (Impella). Patients were evaluated at 24 hours post-PVAD, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, and PVAD weaning. Hemodynamic criteria consisted of key targets, including mean arterial pressure ≥60 mm Hg, lactate <2.0 mmol/L, right atrial pressure <15 mm Hg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure <20 mm Hg, pulmonary artery pulsatility index ≥1.0, and cardiac power output ≥0.6 W. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and unplanned mechanical circulatory support reintroduction.

RESULTS

A total of 501 patients were enrolled: 206 (41%) with PVAD alone and 295 (59%) with PVAD and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The majority of patients were supported with Impella CP (406, 81%). Fulfillment of criteria was observed in 37%, 52%, and 45% at 24 hours post-PVAD, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, and PVAD weaning, respectively. Patients with unfulfilled criteria at each evaluation point were at high risk for the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.1-4.8]; hazard ratio, 2.1 [1.2-3.7]; and hazard ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.6]). Hemodynamic criteria achievement consistently stratified the risk of the primary outcome across different subgroups, including shock cause, shock stage, and concomitant use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase-specific hemodynamic criteria are often unmet and are associated with significantly higher risks of short-term fatal events.

Для цитирования: Ikeda Yuki, Saku Keita, Nakata Jun, Unoki Takashi, Yamamoto Takeshi, Sakamoto Tomohiro, Ako Junya, UNLOADERS‐PVAD Investigators. Phase-Specific Hemodynamic Criteria and Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2025. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.125.042249.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.