Journal of pain research · 2026
Prevention and Management of Wound Procedural Pain Management in Adult Patients with Open Wounds: Integration of the Latest Clinical Evidence.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yao Honglin, Yang Fan, Ye Xianghong, Yang Yang, Li Jiaqi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To retrieve, evaluate, and integrate the best available evidence on prevention and management of wound procedural pain management in patients with open wounds, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following the "6S" pyramid model, we systematically searched guideline websites, professional association websites, and databases for guidelines, clinical decision aids, expert consensus statements, evidence summaries, recommended practices, and systematic reviews related to wound procedural pain management in patients with open wounds. The search period was from the establishment of the database to July 2025. Two researchers independently conducted literature quality assessment, evidence extraction, and synthesis.
RESULTS: A total of 23 documents were included: 5 guidelines, 1 expert consensus, 3 recommended practices, 3 clinical decisions, 6 evidence summaries, and 5 systematic reviews. Thirty-two best evidence statements were summarized across six aspects: pain assessment and documentation, education and training, dressing selection and replacement, wound cleansing, debridement, and negative pressure therapy, pharmacological intervention strategies, and non-pharmacological intervention strategies.
CONCLUSION: This study reviews the best available evidence on managing procedural pain in open wounds. It offers guidance on the principles of pain management, standardization of procedural techniques, and the timely application of analgesic, emphasizing the importance of pain awareness. The research serves as a reference for developing specialized pain management protocols to improve wound care quality.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following the "6S" pyramid model, we systematically searched guideline websites, professional association websites, and databases for guidelines, clinical decision aids, expert consensus statements, evidence summaries, recommended practices, and systematic reviews related to wound procedural pain management in patients with open wounds. The search period was from the establishment of the database to July 2025. Two researchers independently conducted literature quality assessment, evidence extraction, and synthesis.
RESULTS: A total of 23 documents were included: 5 guidelines, 1 expert consensus, 3 recommended practices, 3 clinical decisions, 6 evidence summaries, and 5 systematic reviews. Thirty-two best evidence statements were summarized across six aspects: pain assessment and documentation, education and training, dressing selection and replacement, wound cleansing, debridement, and negative pressure therapy, pharmacological intervention strategies, and non-pharmacological intervention strategies.
CONCLUSION: This study reviews the best available evidence on managing procedural pain in open wounds. It offers guidance on the principles of pain management, standardization of procedural techniques, and the timely application of analgesic, emphasizing the importance of pain awareness. The research serves as a reference for developing specialized pain management protocols to improve wound care quality.