Clinical performance of four multiplex real-time PCR kits detecting urogenital and sexually transmitted pathogens.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the clinical performances of four multiplex real-time PCR commercial kits for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis: the STI PLUS ELITe MGB kit (ELITechGroup), N. gonorrhoeae/C. trachomatis/M. genitalium/T.vaginalis Real-TM kit (Sacace Biotechnologies), Allplex STI Essential kit (Seegene), and FTD Urethritis Plus kit (Fast-Track Diagnostics).

METHODS

The kit performance for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, M. genitalium and T. vaginalis detection was compared to that of the cobas CT/NG and TV/MG kits (Roche Diagnostics) using 425 samples, mainly urine and cervicovaginal, throat and rectal swabs. Detection of Ureaplasma parvum, U. urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis were compared to that of in-house TaqMan PCRs.

RESULTS

The four kits showed good performances for the detection of C. trachomatis. They all presented a low positive agreement for the detection of M. genitalium and T. vaginalis (ranges 63.3-74.1% and 51.2-68.4%, respectively) compared to the cobas MG/TV kit. The Seegene and Sacace kits showed additional low positive agreement for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae (71.2%, 95%CI 61.8-79.0 and 63.1%, 95%CI 53.5-71.8, respectively). We observed a slight but significant lower negative agreement for N. gonorrhoeae detection using the ELITechGroup kit (92.5%, 89.1-94.9) and for M. genitalium detection using the Fast-Track kit (93.2%, 89.6-95.7) compared to other kits.

CONCLUSION

Multiplex real-time PCR kits are convenient methods for the detection of several pathogens associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in a single step, but colonizing Ureaplasma spp. and M. hominis species should not be included in these kits. Users should be aware of the weak performance of some kits for the detection of M. genitalium and T. vaginalis.