Low rectal volumes in patients suffering from fecal incontinence: what does it mean?

BACKGROUND

Rectal perception and adaptation to distension are widely heterogeneous in subjects with faecal incontinence.

AIM: To quantify rectal physiology in patients with incontinence and low maximum rectal volume, according to AGA guidelines on anorectal testing techniques.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

148 patients (12 men, 136 female) with incontinence to liquid and/or solid stools were investigated. Distending isobaric procedures were carried out using an electronic barostat in order to analyse perception and adaptation of the rectum.

RESULTS

Pain during isovolumic rectal distension at a level of 100 mL or less was experienced in 21 subjects (14.2%). As defined by isobaric distensions, incontinent patients with low MTV had more frequently a hypocompliant rectum (62%) when compared with those with higher MTV (31%, P = 0.046). Perception scores tended to be higher at each step of distending rectal pressure: incontinent patients with low MTV had more frequently a hypersensitive rectum (48%) when compared with those with normal or high MTV (24%, P = 0.035). Only four of 21 incontinent subjects with low MTV had an isolated hypersensitive rectum.

CONCLUSION

Both sensitivity and compliance are altered in patients with low MTV. A more extensive study of the role of sensory and compliance aspects of subjects with incontinence is warranted.