British journal of urology · 1998
The correction of congenital penile curvature in young men.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baskin L S, Lue T F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome of multiple parallel plication (MPP) used for correcting congenital penile curvature (with normal urethra and corpus spongiosum), a technique which takes account of the greater force of erection in young men (mean arterial pressure approximately 100 mmHg) than in neonates (approximately 60 mmHg).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All young men who underwent surgical correction of congenital penile curvature using the multiple parallel plication technique between 1992 and 1995 were reviewed, from their charts and by a telephone survey.
RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age 22.3 years, SD 4, range 17-29) were identified, all of whom had been followed for more than one year (mean 2.8, SD 1.3, range 1.2-4.8). All 10 patients reported a preoperative curvature of 60-90 degrees; postoperatively, eight of the 10 patients had a successful outcome, based on self-documentation of a straighter penis (eight) and/or satisfactory intercourse (four). Two of these eight requested follow-up plications to correct a residual curvature of 15 degrees. All patients reported feeling the sutures as a small bump on the dorsal aspect of the penis. In one patient this was considered bothersome, but it did not interfere with intercourse. In one patient the curvature recurred 5 weeks after surgery, following intercourse. Another patient was lost to follow-up and could not be evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The MPP technique has the following advantages; it entails no dissection of the neurovascular bundle or corpus spongiosum of the tunica, avoiding complications (such as impotence and urethral injury) that may occur with manipulation of these structures; it can be performed under local anaesthesia and can be completed within 30 min; suture cut-through is unlikely because the dorsum (12 o'clock position) of the tunica albuginea is the thickest and hence strongest area of the corporal body; and the straightness of the penis can be determined easily because erection is sustained throughout the procedure. The disadvantages of the MPP technique are; several small bumps from the nonabsorbable sutures may be palpable, and the patient needs to be informed of this preoperatively: aspiration and phenylephrine injection may be required to prevent priapism.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All young men who underwent surgical correction of congenital penile curvature using the multiple parallel plication technique between 1992 and 1995 were reviewed, from their charts and by a telephone survey.
RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age 22.3 years, SD 4, range 17-29) were identified, all of whom had been followed for more than one year (mean 2.8, SD 1.3, range 1.2-4.8). All 10 patients reported a preoperative curvature of 60-90 degrees; postoperatively, eight of the 10 patients had a successful outcome, based on self-documentation of a straighter penis (eight) and/or satisfactory intercourse (four). Two of these eight requested follow-up plications to correct a residual curvature of 15 degrees. All patients reported feeling the sutures as a small bump on the dorsal aspect of the penis. In one patient this was considered bothersome, but it did not interfere with intercourse. In one patient the curvature recurred 5 weeks after surgery, following intercourse. Another patient was lost to follow-up and could not be evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The MPP technique has the following advantages; it entails no dissection of the neurovascular bundle or corpus spongiosum of the tunica, avoiding complications (such as impotence and urethral injury) that may occur with manipulation of these structures; it can be performed under local anaesthesia and can be completed within 30 min; suture cut-through is unlikely because the dorsum (12 o'clock position) of the tunica albuginea is the thickest and hence strongest area of the corporal body; and the straightness of the penis can be determined easily because erection is sustained throughout the procedure. The disadvantages of the MPP technique are; several small bumps from the nonabsorbable sutures may be palpable, and the patient needs to be informed of this preoperatively: aspiration and phenylephrine injection may be required to prevent priapism.