European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2018
Should the visceral peritoneum be closed over mesh in abdominal sacrocolpopexy?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kulhan M, Kulhan N G, Ata N, Nayki U A, Nayki C, Ulug P, Yilmaz N
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Peritonisation of mesh during Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is generally advocated to prevent adhesions to the viscera; however, randomized clinical trials are lacking. In this study; we aimed to investigate whether the mesh peritonisation is clinically significant or not.
MATERIAL METHOD: Thirty-four patients who were operated for the reason of pelvic organ prolapse were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups by retrospective scanning from the files and surgical reports. Group 1 patients consisted of those who underwent peritonisation and group 2 patients consisted of those who did not in abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
RESULTS: Operative time and the amount of blood lost were statistically less in the group 2. Postoperative pain and analgesic drug requirements were obviously higher in the group 1. Postoperative De novo dyspareunia and urinary urgency were higher in the group 1. There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of other complications.
CONCLUSION: We noticed that there was no difference between the patients who were peritonized and those who were not in terms of postoperative complications.
MATERIAL METHOD: Thirty-four patients who were operated for the reason of pelvic organ prolapse were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups by retrospective scanning from the files and surgical reports. Group 1 patients consisted of those who underwent peritonisation and group 2 patients consisted of those who did not in abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
RESULTS: Operative time and the amount of blood lost were statistically less in the group 2. Postoperative pain and analgesic drug requirements were obviously higher in the group 1. Postoperative De novo dyspareunia and urinary urgency were higher in the group 1. There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of other complications.
CONCLUSION: We noticed that there was no difference between the patients who were peritonized and those who were not in terms of postoperative complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Abdominal WallAdultAnalgesicsBlood Loss, SurgicalCross-Sectional StudiesDyspareuniaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative PainPelvic Organ ProlapsePeritoneumPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurgical MeshTissue AdhesionsTurkeyUrinary Incontinence, Urge