MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21873/anticanres.15777

Медицинская библиотека · Anticancer research · 2022

Recurrent Mandibular Giant Cell Lesion in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Second Hit Mutation on the NF1 Gene in the Osseous Lesion.

Friedrich Reinhard E, Luebke Andreas M, Schüller Ulrich, Hagel Christian, Kohlrusch Felix K, Wieland Ilse, Zenker Martin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: In the autosomal dominant hereditary disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), lesions of the jaw develop in isolated cases, which are diagnosed as central giant cell granuloma (CGCG). This study aimed to clarify the genetic basis of a bone lesion in a syndromic patient.

CASE REPORT: The NF1 patient had developed a CGCG that recurred after local excision. Blood and tumor tissue were studied for NF1 mutations using advanced molecular genetic methods. Examinations of blood and tumor tissue provided evidence of the constitutive mutation in both samples. A further mutation was detected in the tumor, which was interpreted as a somatic mutation. The detection of somatic mutation in the tissue was successful both on native and routinely fixed material.

CONCLUSION

The study supports current assessments of CGCG as a benign neoplasm. In NF1 patients, the phenotype seems to imply bi-allelic loss of the NF1 gene. The detection of both mutations in routinely fixed tissue allows studies of archived tissue samples with this diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Friedrich Reinhard E, Luebke Andreas M, Schüller Ulrich, Hagel Christian, Kohlrusch Felix K, Wieland Ilse, Zenker Martin. Recurrent Mandibular Giant Cell Lesion in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Second Hit Mutation on the NF1 Gene in the Osseous Lesion.. Anticancer research. 2022. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15777.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.