DOI 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.09.015
Estimating the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Japan: A nationwide medical claims database study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Limited data are available regarding therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This study assessed the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of HCM in Japan.
METHODS
This retrospective database study analyzed data from 438 hospitals in the Japan Medical Data Vision database from 2016 to 2020. We identified 3913 patients (15 %) with obstructive HCM (oHCM) and 21,714 patients (85 %) with nonobstructive HCM (nHCM).
RESULTS
The estimated total number of patients with oHCM and nHCM in 2020 among Japanese hospitals was 8500 and 43,500, respectively. The prevalence of oHCM and nHCM steadily increased by 27 % and 12 %, respectively, from 2016 to 2020, with a 1:5.2 ratio of oHCM to nHCM in 2020. The mean age of the oHCM and nHCM populations was 72 and 70 years, respectively, and comorbidities included atrial fibrillation (AF) (oHCM, 33.8 %; nHCM, 32.2 %), other arrythmia (30.1 %; 27.6 %), and stroke (16.6 %; 16.4 %). Furthermore, 45.0 % of oHCM and 37.7 % of nHCM patients had undergone at least one hospitalization. A substantial number of HCM patients aged between 20 and 59 years reported AF (oHCM, 17-37 %; nHCM, 4-24 %) and stroke (oHCM, 0-12 %; nHCM, 3-10 %). β-blockers (oHCM, 64.0 %; nHCM, 42.1 %) were the most frequently prescribed treatment, followed by Na channel blockers (29.5 %; 5.7 %), calcium channel blockers (18.1 %; 8.8 %), direct oral anticoagulants (14.5 %; 15.2 %), and warfarin (11.0 %; 11.4 %).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides important information on the current epidemiological and clinical characteristics of HCM in Japan.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.