MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00423-025-03645-4

Медицинская библиотека · Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic central hepatectomy: a comparison with open surgery.

Masuda Takashi, Endo Yuichi, Nakamura Shun, Miyoshino Wataru, Nagasawa Yuiko, Orimoto Hiroki, Kawamura Masahiro, Fujinaga Atsuro, Takayama Hiroomi, Kawano Yoko, Hirashita Teijiro, Inomata Masafumi

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic liver resection has advantages over open liver resection, including reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Laparoscopic central hepatectomy (CH) is a highly challenging procedure, and such outcomes can only be achieved with a high level of expertise in laparoscopic liver surgery. Laparoscopic CH remains challenging, with safety and efficacy unclear. This study retrospectively evaluated the intra- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open CH and assessed safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

CH included anterior sectionectomy (AS) and central bisectionectomy (CBS) (excluding cases with biliary reconstruction). The study comprised 38 patients receiving CH in our department from January 2010 to November 2023.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic group included 14 cases and the open group 24. AS/CBS was performed in 14/10 open group cases and 6/8 laparoscopic group cases. Short-term surgical outcomes showed no significant between-group difference in operative time, but the laparoscopic group lost significantly less blood (250 vs. 985 mL; p = 0.001) and the transfusion rate was lower (14% vs. 46%; p = 0.004). Among postoperative outcomes, incidence of bile leakage was not significantly different (33% vs. 42%; p = 0.42), but the laparoscopic group had significantly less postoperative ascites (0% vs. 17%; p = 0.047), fewer surgical site infections (SSI) (0% vs. 21%; p = 0.02), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (14 vs. 30 days; p = 0.005). The risk factor for bile leakage in CH by univariate and multivariate analysis was tumor proximity to the right anterior Glissonean pedicle (OR = 6.84; 95% CI = 1.67-32.7; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic CH could be performed safely. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic CH was effective in reducing blood loss, postoperative ascites, SSIs, and shortening postoperative hospital stay. However, tumors close to the root of the right anterior Glissonean pedicle were considered a risk factor for postoperative bile leakage and require caution.

Для цитирования: Masuda Takashi, Endo Yuichi, Nakamura Shun, Miyoshino Wataru, Nagasawa Yuiko, Orimoto Hiroki, Kawamura Masahiro, Fujinaga Atsuro, Takayama Hiroomi, Kawano Yoko, Hirashita Teijiro, Inomata Masafumi. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic central hepatectomy: a comparison with open surgery.. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03645-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.