DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.004
The predictive value of DESH for shunt responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Selecting probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients for shunt insertion presents a challenge because of coexisting comorbidities and other conditions that could mimic NPH. The characteristic appearance of DESH (Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus) on brain imaging has been shown to have a high positive predictive value in identifying shunt responsive INPH patients (SINPHONI trial). However, the negative predictive value of this radiological sign was not clearly demonstrated. The aim of the present study was to calculate the negative predictive value of the DESH sign.
METHODS
A single centre study of probable INPH patients, who underwent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion. Shunt responsive INPH patients were identified as those having improvement in their walking speed, neuropsychological assessment and continence one year post operatively. Preoperative images were reviewed for DESH sign. Negative and Positive Predictive Values (NPV and PPV) of DESH sign were determined post analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 103 probable INPH patients were included (31 were DESH positive (30%) and 72 were DESH negative (70%)). A total of 78 patients showed measurable improvement one year post shunt insertion (76%); 24 (31%) of these patients were DESH positive and 54 (69%) were DESH negative (p=<0.001). Therefore, the DESH sign had an estimated PPV of 77% and NPV of 25%.
CONCLUSION
DESH sign demonstrates a low negative predictive value. We conclude that DESH negative patients should still undergo prognostic tests for iNPH, such as an extended lumbar drainage protocol, and should not be excluded from shunt insertion.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.