MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1142/s0218810410004801

Медицинская библиотека · Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand · 2010

Dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius - a study of preferred treatment options among UK trauma and orthopaedic surgeons.

Hull P, Baraza N, Whalley H, Brewster M, Costa M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Distal radius fractures are common, and surgeons have in their armament a variety of ways of treating them. In this study, 50 orthopaedic surgeons in the UK were shown five clinical scenarios and radiographs from patients with various fracture patterns of the distal radius, and were asked for their preferred management. There was a wide variation in the preferred treatment for each scenario presented. Across all of the cases, 52% of surgeons preferred to use a volar locking-plate compared with 21% who chose fixation with Kirschner wires. There was very little consensus among surgeons with regard to the optimal method of fixation for patients sustaining dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius. This disagreement is not surprising as there is currently no high level evidence to guide surgeons as to the best management option for this common and potentially debilitating injury.

Для цитирования: Hull P, Baraza N, Whalley H, Brewster M, Costa M. Dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius - a study of preferred treatment options among UK trauma and orthopaedic surgeons.. Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. 2010. DOI: 10.1142/s0218810410004801.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.