MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery · 2024

[Penetrating Lung Injury Complicated by Hemodynamic Cerebral Infarction].

Takizawa Masaya, Takahashi Tomohiko, Yamagishi Kazuki, Kobayashi Hiroaki

СтатьяКлинический случайПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We encountered a case in which emergency surgery was performed for a penetrating lung injury complicated by a hemodynamic cerebral infarction. A 45-year-old man sustained a chest injury due to a scattered piece of metal and was admitted to a nearby hospital. He was confirmed to have hemorrhagic shock due to a right hemopneumothorax, and a chest tube was inserted he was transferred to our hospital. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a metal fragment in the right lung and confirmed the diagnosis of a penetrating lung injury due to a foreign body. The patient also presented with total blindness of an unknown etiology. Emergency surgery was performed to treat the injury and remove the foreign body. A large amount of blood and hematoma were removed from the right thoracic cavity, and a metal fragment was found in the lower lobe of the right lung. After removing the foreign body, pulmonary suturing was performed. On the following day, head magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple cerebral infarctions in the bilateral occipital lobes, left frontal lobe, and left cerebellar hemisphere. However, no vascular occlusion or thrombus was found, and the patient was diagnosed with hemodynamic cerebral infarction due to hemorrhagic shock.

Для цитирования: Takizawa Masaya, Takahashi Tomohiko, Yamagishi Kazuki, Kobayashi Hiroaki. [Penetrating Lung Injury Complicated by Hemodynamic Cerebral Infarction].. Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery. 2024.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.