MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00140130902915939

Медицинская библиотека · Ergonomics · 2009

Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a questionnaire on work-related exposure related to arm, shoulder and neck symptoms in computer workers.

Speklé E M, Hoozemans M J M, van der Beek A J, Blatter B M, Bongers P M, van Dieën J H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this study was to determine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the RSI QuickScan, a newly developed questionnaire that aims to identify the presumed risk factors for neck, shoulder and arm symptoms in a population of computer workers. The internal consistency was calculated using item analysis. The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity were analysed by calculating the percentage of agreement, Cohen's Kappa and the Ppositive and Pnegative. The concurrent validity was also tested by comparing the results from the new questionnaire with those from the original questionnaires that the current questionnaire was based on, on-site expert observations and direct measurements. The results indicate that the RSI QuickScan is a measurement tool with acceptable internal consistency, reliability and concurrent validity. The questionnaire can be used as a means to rapidly collect data on a large population of office workers and at low cost.

Для цитирования: Speklé E M, Hoozemans M J M, van der Beek A J, Blatter B M, Bongers P M, van Dieën J H. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a questionnaire on work-related exposure related to arm, shoulder and neck symptoms in computer workers.. Ergonomics. 2009. DOI: 10.1080/00140130902915939.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.