MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.230638

Медицинская библиотека · Zhongguo yi liao qi xie za zhi = Chinese journal of medical instrumentation · 2024

[Clinical Evaluation of Dural (Spinal) Membrane Repair Materials].

Zhang Linling, Su Chang, Dong Tingting, Zheng Kun

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To select high-quality and cost-effective dural (spinal) membrane repair materials, in order to reduce the cost of consumables procurement, save medical insurance funds, and optimize hospital operation and management.

METHODS

Taking the BS06B disease group (spinal cord and spinal canal surgery without extremely severe or severe complications and comorbidities, mainly diagnosed as congenital tethered cord syndrome) as an example, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the relevant data of surgical treatment for congenital tethered cord syndrome conducted in our hospital from January 2021 to June 2023. Safety and efficacy indicators in clinical application (incidence of postoperative epidural hemorrhage, incidence of postoperative purulent cerebrospinal meningitis, incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, surgical duration, and postoperative hospital stay) were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in safety and effectiveness between different brands of dura mater repair materials.

CONCLUSION

For the repair of small incisions in dura mater surgery, high-quality and cost-effective dura mater repair materials can be selected to reduce hospital costs and control expenses for the disease group.

Для цитирования: Zhang Linling, Su Chang, Dong Tingting, Zheng Kun. [Clinical Evaluation of Dural (Spinal) Membrane Repair Materials].. Zhongguo yi liao qi xie za zhi = Chinese journal of medical instrumentation. 2024. DOI: 10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.230638.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.