MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/go.24.00166

Медицинская библиотека · JCO global oncology · 2025

Olanzapine Versus NK1 Receptor Antagonist for Prevention of Carboplatin-Induced (AUC ≥4) Emesis: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial From India.

Bhargave Sneh, Sharma Vinod, Kataria Babita, Batra Atul, Pushpam Deepam, Sharma Aparna, Pramanik Raja, Malik Prabhat S, Sahoo Ranjit K, Khurana Sachin, Singh Vishwajeet, Bakhshi Sameer, Sharma Atul, Kumar Lalit, Kumar Akash

СтатьяКлиническое исследование III фазыРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеEquivalence TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with currently recommended NK1 receptor antagonist-based triplet during carboplatin (AUC ≥4) chemotherapy appears inadequate. A comparative study between olanzapine and NK1 receptor antagonist-based combination is lacking.

METHODS

This was a single-center, phase III, prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority study comparing olanzapine (olanzapine, ondansetron, dexamethasone [OOD]-experimental arm) with fosaprepitant (fosaprepitant, ondansetron, dexamethasone [FOD]-standard arm) in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone among chemotherapy-naïve patients (age ≥18 years) receiving carboplatin (AUC ≥4) during the first cycle of single-day chemotherapy. The OOD arm received olanzapine 5 mg per oral once daily (day 1-4), ondansetron 8 mg with dexametahsone 12 mg intravenous (IV) once daily (20 mg with paclitaxel; day 1), and matching placebo for fosaprepitant (day 1). The FOD arm received fosaprepitant 150 mg IV once daily, with the combination (day 1) and matching placebo for olanzapine (days 1-4). The primary outcome was no nausea during the overall period (0-120 hours).

RESULTS

Between April 2021 and August 2022, a total of 195 patients were evaluable. The proportion of patients without nausea (0 as per Edmonton Symptom Assessment System scale) in OOD versus FOD arms was 44.1% versus 34.4% (P = .19) in the overall period (0-120 hours). Complete response rates and total control rates were also similar in both arms. One patient had grade 3 sedation in the olanzapine arm.

CONCLUSION

Olanzapine, in comparison with NK1 antagonist, is not superior for nausea control during carboplatin-induced emesis. It may act as an effective oral alternative for prevention.

Для цитирования: Bhargave Sneh, Sharma Vinod, Kataria Babita, Batra Atul, Pushpam Deepam, Sharma Aparna, Pramanik Raja, Malik Prabhat S, Sahoo Ranjit K, Khurana Sachin, Singh Vishwajeet, Bakhshi Sameer, Sharma Atul, Kumar Lalit, Kumar Akash. Olanzapine Versus NK1 Receptor Antagonist for Prevention of Carboplatin-Induced (AUC ≥4) Emesis: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial From India.. JCO global oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.1200/go.24.00166.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.