A comparison of the effects of pulsatile and bolus flushing methods on lipid emulsion residues that lead to bacterial growth in intravenous catheters.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of pulsatile and bolus flushing methods for removing residual parenteral nutrients in common shapes of central venous (CV) and peripheral venous (PV) catheters.

METHODS

Straight or looped tubes filled with parenteral nutrients containing indocyanine green (ICG) were flushed with 10 mL of saline at various speeds with several pulsatile intervals. Pseudomonas aeruginosa engineered with a luciferase gene was inoculated in the flushed CV catheters. The imaging technique detected the ICG remaining and the bacterial growth in the flushed catheters.

RESULTS

In the CV catheter, the residue was greater with pulsatile flushing with longer intervals than with bolus flushing at a relatively high flushing speed. In the PV catheter, the flushing speed with any pulsatile intervals did not affect the residue. A looped catheter showed less residue than the straight catheter regardless of the flushing condition. Bacterial growth occurred in the nutrient residue in the flushed tubes.

CONCLUSION

Speed of flushing and the shape of catheters, but not pulsatile flow generation, are essential components for the efficacious removal of parenteral nutrients in the catheter. Moreover, the slight differences in remaining nutrients inside the catheter affected subsequent bacterial growth.