MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/olq.0000000000000754

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 2018

Prevalence of Rectal Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections: A Systematic Review.

Dewart Courtney M, Bernstein Kyle T, DeGroote Nicholas P, Romaguera Raul, Turner Abigail Norris

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We undertook a systematic review to examine rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) infections in women and men who have sex with men (MSM). English-language publications measuring rectal Ct or Ng prevalence using nucleic acid amplification tests were eligible. Searching multiple electronic databases, we identified 115 eligible reports published between January 2000 and November 2016. Overall, the prevalence of rectal Ct (9%) was higher than that of rectal Ng (4.7%). Rectal Ct prevalence was similar in MSM (9%) and women (9.2%), whereas rectal Ng prevalence was higher in MSM (6.1%) than in women (1.7%). Generally, rectal Ct prevalence was similar in sexually transmitted disease clinics (9.1%) and nonsexual health clinics (8.6%), whereas rectal Ng prevalence was somewhat lower in sexually transmitted disease clinics (4.5%) than in nonsexual health clinics (6%). These infections seem to be relatively common across a range of populations and clinical settings, highlighting the need for additional research on these preventable, treatable conditions.

Для цитирования: Dewart Courtney M, Bernstein Kyle T, DeGroote Nicholas P, Romaguera Raul, Turner Abigail Norris. Prevalence of Rectal Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections: A Systematic Review.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000000754.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.