Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021
Novel use of the Sentinel cerebral protection device during thrombosed septal occluder explant and Atriclip appendage closure.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nunez-Pellot Cristina, Mehta Jeet J, Bitetzakis Christopher J, Belli Erol, Mohanty Bibhu D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Our case demonstrates a novel use of the Sentinel™ cerebral protection device (SCPD) for prevention of stroke during removal of a thrombus-adherent atrial septal occluder.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old male with multiple strokes and ostium secundum atrial septal defect closed ten years prior using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder presented with recurrent neurologic symptoms. Over the ensuing year, serial transesophageal echocardiography revealed persistent and worsening device-adherent thrombus despite trial of different anticoagulants. The device appeared to be mal-deployed, prompting the decision for surgical explant. Given concern for embolization during explant, an SCPD was placed. Excision, pericardial patch repair, and Atriclip appendage closure (AAC) were performed. The device demonstrated incomplete endothelialization and microthrombi. SCPD filtration revealed embolic debris.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the first successful use of an SCPD during surgical excision of a mal-deployed occluder. With its ease of use and safety, SCPD may have utility in surgeries with high cardio-embolic risk.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old male with multiple strokes and ostium secundum atrial septal defect closed ten years prior using an Amplatzer Septal Occluder presented with recurrent neurologic symptoms. Over the ensuing year, serial transesophageal echocardiography revealed persistent and worsening device-adherent thrombus despite trial of different anticoagulants. The device appeared to be mal-deployed, prompting the decision for surgical explant. Given concern for embolization during explant, an SCPD was placed. Excision, pericardial patch repair, and Atriclip appendage closure (AAC) were performed. The device demonstrated incomplete endothelialization and microthrombi. SCPD filtration revealed embolic debris.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the first successful use of an SCPD during surgical excision of a mal-deployed occluder. With its ease of use and safety, SCPD may have utility in surgeries with high cardio-embolic risk.