Journal of medical microbiology · 1998
Comparison of two serological methods and a polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of acute respiratory infections with Chlamydia pneumoniae in adults.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Petitjean J, Vincent F, Fretigny M, Vabret A, Poveda J D, Brun J, Freymuth F
Аннотация
Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common respiratory tract pathogen. Serological methods currently used for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection lack specificity, give ambiguous results from a single serum sample and often provide only a retrospective diagnosis. A prospective study was undertaken to assess whether PCR could be a useful addition to the serological techniques routinely practised for diagnosis. This study investigated 68 adult patients with a diagnosis of acute respiratory infection. Acute and convalescent serological determination of antibodies to C. pneumoniae were performed by means of an rELISA test and a micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) test. Nasopharyngeal aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and bronchial aspirates obtained from the 68 patients were evaluated by PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) for the presence of C. pneumoniae and by immunofluorescence assay and cell culture for virus identification. Mycoplasma pneumoniae serology was also performed. Eight patients (11.8%) were positive by either rELISA or PCR-EIA, or both, with an infection rate of 5 (18.5%) of 27 in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, 2 (9%) of 22 in asthmatic patients and 1 (5%) of 19 in patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Serological evidence of acute infection was found in four of these patients with the rELISA test and in three others with the MIF test. PCR-EIA detected C. pneumoniae DNA in four specimens, but there were concordant results with both rELISA and PCR-EIA in only one patient A positive PCR-EIA was also obtained in a patient who did not show an antibody response in acute serum. The discrepancy between serological and PCR-EIA results reflects the difficulties in routine laboratory diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection and the necessity for further studies with optimised techniques.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialAsthmaBronchiBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidChlamydia InfectionsChlamydophila pneumoniaeCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDNA, BacterialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxPneumonia, BacterialPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesRespiratory Tract InfectionsSensitivity and Specificity