European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2017
Use of the endometriosis fertility index in daily practice: A prospective evaluation.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boujenah J, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Herbemont C, Bricou A, Sifer C, Poncelet C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To perform a prospective evaluation of postoperative fertility management using the endometriosis fertility index (EFI).
STUDY: This prospective non-interventional observational study was performed from January 2013 to February 2016 in a tertiary care university hospital and an assisted reproductive technology (ART) centre. In total, 196 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis-related infertility. Indications for surgery included pelvic pain (dysmenorrhoea, and/or deep dyspareunia), abnormal hysterosalpingogram, and failure to conceive after three or more superovulation cycles with or without intra-uterine insemination. Multidisciplinary fertility management followed the surgical diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Three postoperative options were proposed to couples based on the EFI score: EFI score ≤4, ART (Option 1); EFI score 5-6, non-ART management for 4-6 months followed by ART (Option 2); or EFI score ≥7, non-ART management for 6-9 months followed by ART (Option 3). The main outcomes were non-ART pregnancy rates and cumulative pregnancy rates according to EFI score. Univariate and multivariate analyses with backward stepwise logistic regression were used to explain the occurrence of non-ART pregnancy after surgery for women with EFI scores ≥5. Adjustment was made for potential confounding variables that were significant (p<0.05) or tending towards significance (p<0.1) on univariate analysis.
RESULTS: The cumulative pregnancy rate was 76%. The total number of women and pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were: 26 and 42.3%; 56 and 67.9%; and 114 and 87.7%, respectively. The non-ART pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were 0%, 30.5% and 48.2%, respectively. The ART pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were 50%, 60.6% and 80.3%, respectively. The mean time to conceive for non-ART pregnancies was 4.2 months. The benefit of ART was inversely correlated with the mean EFI score. On multivariate analysis, the EFI score was significantly associated with non-ART pregnancy (odds ratio 1.629, 95% confidence interval 1.235-2.150).
CONCLUSION: In daily prospective practice, the EFI was useful for subsequent postoperative fertility management in infertile patients with endometriosis.
STUDY: This prospective non-interventional observational study was performed from January 2013 to February 2016 in a tertiary care university hospital and an assisted reproductive technology (ART) centre. In total, 196 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis-related infertility. Indications for surgery included pelvic pain (dysmenorrhoea, and/or deep dyspareunia), abnormal hysterosalpingogram, and failure to conceive after three or more superovulation cycles with or without intra-uterine insemination. Multidisciplinary fertility management followed the surgical diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Three postoperative options were proposed to couples based on the EFI score: EFI score ≤4, ART (Option 1); EFI score 5-6, non-ART management for 4-6 months followed by ART (Option 2); or EFI score ≥7, non-ART management for 6-9 months followed by ART (Option 3). The main outcomes were non-ART pregnancy rates and cumulative pregnancy rates according to EFI score. Univariate and multivariate analyses with backward stepwise logistic regression were used to explain the occurrence of non-ART pregnancy after surgery for women with EFI scores ≥5. Adjustment was made for potential confounding variables that were significant (p<0.05) or tending towards significance (p<0.1) on univariate analysis.
RESULTS: The cumulative pregnancy rate was 76%. The total number of women and pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were: 26 and 42.3%; 56 and 67.9%; and 114 and 87.7%, respectively. The non-ART pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were 0%, 30.5% and 48.2%, respectively. The ART pregnancy rates for Options 1, 2 and 3 were 50%, 60.6% and 80.3%, respectively. The mean time to conceive for non-ART pregnancies was 4.2 months. The benefit of ART was inversely correlated with the mean EFI score. On multivariate analysis, the EFI score was significantly associated with non-ART pregnancy (odds ratio 1.629, 95% confidence interval 1.235-2.150).
CONCLUSION: In daily prospective practice, the EFI was useful for subsequent postoperative fertility management in infertile patients with endometriosis.