American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2007
Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Farrell Scott A, Baydock Sandra, Amir Baharak, Fanning Cora
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a new self-positioning women's incontinence pessary.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two women were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. Evaluation included baseline questionnaires, physical examination including pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores, cotton swab testing, and assessment of Kegel strength. A pad test and 7 day urolog were also performed before and after pessary fitting.
RESULTS: Incontinence questionnaire scores were all significantly reduced as percent of baseline: stress incontinence, 7 of 15 (47%) (P = .000); urge incontinence, 5 of 14 (36%) (P = .002); the urogenital distress inventory (short form); 2 of 6 (33%) (P = .002); and incontinence impact questionnaire (short form), 4 of 8 (50%) (P = .002). Leaking episodes decreased by 4 (7 day urolog) (P = .028) and pad weights by 11 g (P = .006). Among women successfully fitted at 2 weeks, 16 of 21 or 76% continued using their pessary at 1 year. There were no complications with pessary use.
CONCLUSION: The Uresta incontinence pessary significantly reduces urinary incontinence and is easy for women to use.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two women were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. Evaluation included baseline questionnaires, physical examination including pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores, cotton swab testing, and assessment of Kegel strength. A pad test and 7 day urolog were also performed before and after pessary fitting.
RESULTS: Incontinence questionnaire scores were all significantly reduced as percent of baseline: stress incontinence, 7 of 15 (47%) (P = .000); urge incontinence, 5 of 14 (36%) (P = .002); the urogenital distress inventory (short form); 2 of 6 (33%) (P = .002); and incontinence impact questionnaire (short form), 4 of 8 (50%) (P = .002). Leaking episodes decreased by 4 (7 day urolog) (P = .028) and pad weights by 11 g (P = .006). Among women successfully fitted at 2 weeks, 16 of 21 or 76% continued using their pessary at 1 year. There were no complications with pessary use.
CONCLUSION: The Uresta incontinence pessary significantly reduces urinary incontinence and is easy for women to use.