[Reconstruction of neglected Achilles tendon rupture: flexor hallucis longus transfer versus gastrocnemius turn-down flaps].

Objective

To compare the outcome of either flexor hallucis longus transfer or turn-down of proximal Achilles tendon tissue repair in treating chronic Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

The clinical data of 21 patients who underwent repair of Myerson type Ⅲ chronic Achilles tendon rupture at Peking University Sports Medicine Research Institute from May 2012 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 11 cases were treated with flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer, and 10 cases were treated with gastrocnemius turn-down flaps repair. The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFOS) hindfoot score and Tegner motor function score before and after surgery were recorded and compared between the two groups. Data comparison between groups was performed with t test.

Results

The patients in the both group were followed up for an average of (21±7) months. The postoperative AOFOS hindfoot score in the long flexor and gastrocnemius groups were both significantly higher than those before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (97.7±2.6 vs 72.0±8.1 and 96.0±5.5 vs 78.5±6.4, t=10.70, 6.42, both P<0.05).The postoperative Tegner scores of the two groups were also significantly higher than those before surgery (4.2±1.4 vs 0.7±0.4 and 4.1±0.8 vs 0.6±0.5,t=7.29, 9.35, both P<0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative AOFOS hindfoot scores and Tegner motor function scores between the two groups (both P>0.05).

Conclusion

The flexor hallucis longus transfer and turn-down of proximal Achilles tendon tissue repair can both get satisfactory results in treating chronic Achilles tendon rupture.