MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000490740

Медицинская библиотека · Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2018

Comparison of Outcomes in Conservative versus Surgical Treatments for Ludwig's Angina.

Edetanlen Benlance Ekaniyere, Saheeb Birch Dauda

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment outcomes in patients with early stage Ludwig's angina who received intravenous antibiotics alone with those who received surgical decompression and intravenous antibiotics.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

Individuals with early stage Ludwig's angina were studied using a retrospective cohort study design from August 1997 to September 2017. Data were collected from case notes and logbooks. Appropriate statistical tests were chosen to analyze both the independent and outcome variables. Using 2-tailed test, a level of significance of 0.05 was chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients comprising 38 (69.1%) males and 17 (30.9%) females were studied. The conservative group had a higher number of cases that developed airway compromise (26.3%) when compared to those with surgical approach (2.9%). There was an association between the treatment approach and the development of airway compromise (χ2[1] = 4.83, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

There was a higher incidence of airway compromise in patients treated with intravenous antibiotics alone than in those treated with surgical decompression and intravenous antibiotics.

Для цитирования: Edetanlen Benlance Ekaniyere, Saheeb Birch Dauda. Comparison of Outcomes in Conservative versus Surgical Treatments for Ludwig's Angina.. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2018. DOI: 10.1159/000490740.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.