The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2000
Antepartum evaluation of monochorionic diamniotic (MD) twins; MD-twin score: a new scoring method for perinatal outcome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaneko M, Sameshima H, Ikeda T, Kodama Y, Ikenoue T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to establish a new scoring method to survey monochorionic diamniotic (MD) twins during antepartum periods.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed regarding MD twins delivered between January 1992 and July 1996. Maternal and neonatal records were assessed for the following 5 perinatal variables; birth-weight discordance, amniotic-fluid discordance, hydrops fetalis, umbilical-cord insertion, and fetal-heart-rate monitoring. Each variable was coded as normal or abnormal and then assigned an arbitrary weight of 0 if normal and 1 if abnormal, yielding a range of scores from 0 (all normal) to 5 (all abnormal). The relationships between individual variables and their combinations and the outcome of pregnancy was determined. A poor pregnancy outcome consisted of intrauterine death, neonatal death, or neurological sequelae of at least one twin. The 5-variable combination was termed as the MD-twin score. A chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine statistical significance.
RESULTS: There were 59 MD pregnancies, of which 13 pregnancies resulted in a poor outcome. The single variable that most likely contributed to a poor outcome was amniotic-fluid discordance. All 35 pregnancies with an MD-twin score of < or = 2 had a good outcome. There were 14 pregnancies with a score of 3, and 21% of them had a poor outcome. All of the pregnancies with a score of > or = 4 had a poor outcome. When we chose the MD-twin score of 3 as the critical point for a poor outcome, the likelihood ratio statistics became the highest of any single variable or any combination of variables.
CONCLUSION: The MD-twin score predicted poor outcomes better than did any single variable or combination of variables.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed regarding MD twins delivered between January 1992 and July 1996. Maternal and neonatal records were assessed for the following 5 perinatal variables; birth-weight discordance, amniotic-fluid discordance, hydrops fetalis, umbilical-cord insertion, and fetal-heart-rate monitoring. Each variable was coded as normal or abnormal and then assigned an arbitrary weight of 0 if normal and 1 if abnormal, yielding a range of scores from 0 (all normal) to 5 (all abnormal). The relationships between individual variables and their combinations and the outcome of pregnancy was determined. A poor pregnancy outcome consisted of intrauterine death, neonatal death, or neurological sequelae of at least one twin. The 5-variable combination was termed as the MD-twin score. A chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine statistical significance.
RESULTS: There were 59 MD pregnancies, of which 13 pregnancies resulted in a poor outcome. The single variable that most likely contributed to a poor outcome was amniotic-fluid discordance. All 35 pregnancies with an MD-twin score of < or = 2 had a good outcome. There were 14 pregnancies with a score of 3, and 21% of them had a poor outcome. All of the pregnancies with a score of > or = 4 had a poor outcome. When we chose the MD-twin score of 3 as the critical point for a poor outcome, the likelihood ratio statistics became the highest of any single variable or any combination of variables.
CONCLUSION: The MD-twin score predicted poor outcomes better than did any single variable or combination of variables.