World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2021
Outcomes Following Heterotopic Placement of Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Conduits.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saxena Akshat, Salve Gananjay G, Betts Kim, Arora Nitin, Cole Andrew D, Sholler Gary F, Orr Yishay, Ayer Julian G, Winlaw David S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the outcomes following right ventricle to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduit placement in pediatric patients, excluding those with a RV-PA conduit for the Ross procedure which is associated with improved conduit durability, partly related to its orthotopic position.
METHODS: Outcomes for 119 patients who underwent RV-PA conduit placement at a single institution from January 2004 to December 2016 were reviewed. Primary outcome measures were reintervention-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors associated with reintervention were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median age at the time of conduit placement was 6 months (interquartile range, IQR: 1-14), and the median length of follow-up was 63 months (range: 0-156). During follow-up, 39 patients required conduit-related reintervention, while 6 patients died perioperatively with an overall survival of 90% at 10 years. Among the remaining 113 patients, the RFS at one, five, and ten years was 91% (84%-95%), 72% (60%-80%), and 33% (16%-50%), respectively. The median time to conduit replacement in the series was 43.5 months (IQR: 19.3-76.2). The use of a pulmonary homograft was associated with improved RFS (P = .03), and this was particularly pronounced in comparison with aortic homografts in neonates. Infection was the indication for replacement in only one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the conduits placed during the neonatal period required conduit replacement before the age of five years. Endocarditis was not a common indication for replacement. In neonates and infants, we prefer pulmonary homografts for most indications.
METHODS: Outcomes for 119 patients who underwent RV-PA conduit placement at a single institution from January 2004 to December 2016 were reviewed. Primary outcome measures were reintervention-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors associated with reintervention were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median age at the time of conduit placement was 6 months (interquartile range, IQR: 1-14), and the median length of follow-up was 63 months (range: 0-156). During follow-up, 39 patients required conduit-related reintervention, while 6 patients died perioperatively with an overall survival of 90% at 10 years. Among the remaining 113 patients, the RFS at one, five, and ten years was 91% (84%-95%), 72% (60%-80%), and 33% (16%-50%), respectively. The median time to conduit replacement in the series was 43.5 months (IQR: 19.3-76.2). The use of a pulmonary homograft was associated with improved RFS (P = .03), and this was particularly pronounced in comparison with aortic homografts in neonates. Infection was the indication for replacement in only one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the conduits placed during the neonatal period required conduit replacement before the age of five years. Endocarditis was not a common indication for replacement. In neonates and infants, we prefer pulmonary homografts for most indications.