MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-199710000-00006

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 1997

Risk factors for sexually transmitted disease in Harare: a case-control study.

Wellington M, Ndowa F, Mbengeranwa L

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To obtain information on risk factors and health-seeking behavior of men with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) attending primary care clinics.

STUDY

DESIGN

Unmatched case-control.

METHODS

Cases consisted of 256 consecutive men with genital ulcer disease (GUD) and 256 with other STDs. Control subjects (N = 256) were recruited from every third man with non-STD-related complaints. All subjects were at least 15 years of age. A structured questionnaire was administered.

RESULTS

Genital ulcer disease cases reported more frequent sexual intercourse with a commercial sex worker (odds ratio [OR] = 17.4; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 7.8-40.0) and a recent new sexual contact (OR = 6.7; CI = 3.3-14.1). Similarly, STD cases reported more frequent sexual contact with a commercial sex worker (OR = 3.4; CI = 2.0-5.6) and a recent new sexual contact (OR = 7.9; CI = 3.9-16.3). Reported condom use was less than 30% with all partner types. Of all STD cases, 80% sought treatment at the primary care clinics, with 35% delaying more than 7 days before seeking treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Culturally appropriate behavioral educational programs are advocated to reduce the risk of transmission and the period for seeking treatment for all STDs.

Для цитирования: Wellington M, Ndowa F, Mbengeranwa L. Risk factors for sexually transmitted disease in Harare: a case-control study.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1997. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199710000-00006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.