Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2026
AI as a Safety Net Reader for Mammograms Classified as Normal or Benign in the French Screening Program.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tourasse Christophe, Mesurolle Benoît, Ottavy Maud, Soler-Michel Patricia, Taourel Patrice
Аннотация
In the French national breast cancer screening program, second reading is performed only for mammograms interpreted as negative (Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System [BI-RADS] 1-2) at first reading, representing a unique screening workflow in Europe. This retrospective study assessed whether artificial intelligence (AI) could identify a subgroup of negative screening mammograms that could safely bypass second reading. A total of 55 589 screening mammograms from 42 419 women aged 50-74 years (January 2015-December 2019) whose mammograms were initially classified as BI-RADS 1-2 were analyzed. Second reading outcomes were compared with those of a commercial AI system using a predefined binary threshold (≥5). Among these examinations, 183 of 55 589 (0.33%) were recalled at second reading, yielding 12 cancers (positive predictive value, 6.6%; cancer detection rate, 0.22 per 1000 examinations). AI classified 42 606 of 55 589 (76.6%) examinations as low risk (≤4) and 12 983 of 55 589 (23.3%) as nonlow risk (≥5). One cancer was detected in the AI-low group (one of 55 589 [0.002%]) compared with 11 in the AI-nonlow group (11 of 55 589 [0.020%]; P < .001). Interval cancer rates were higher in the AI-nonlow group than in the AI-low group (2.16 vs 0.47 per 1000 examinations). These findings suggest that excluding AI-low examinations from second reading could reduce workload by approximately 77% while focusing radiologist review on higher-risk cases; prospective validation is needed. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2026 See also commentary by Yao and Chae in this issue.