MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.006

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2019

Efficacy of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Hysteroscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Muzii Ludovico, Donato Violante Di, Tucci Chiara Di, Pinto Anna Di, Cascialli Gianluca, Monti Marco, Patacchiola Felice, Benedetti Panici Pierluigi

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and side effects of antibiotic prophylaxis compared with placebo or no treatment in women undergoing hysteroscopy.

DATA SOURCES: A structured search was carried out in PubMed-Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases through December 31, 2018.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The search included a combination of the following terms: "hysteroscopy," "endoscopic surgery," "antibiotic prophylaxis." The following outcomes were selected: postoperative fever, infection rate, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and abscess occurrence, postoperative antibiotic requirement, and side effects occurrence (lower abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, anaphylactic reaction). A random-effects model was used at meta-analysis. Study quality and bias risk were assessed with the Cochrane tool.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no treatment were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, pooled incidence of events was very low in both groups (fever, 3.79% vs 1.8%; overall infection, .52% vs .58%; postoperative antibiotic therapy, 1.18% vs 1.32%; and lower abdominal pain, 12.46% vs 9.31%). Moreover, the incidence of serious infections requiring further actions (PID or abscess) appeared to be extremely low (.2% in pretreated women and none in control groups). No one trial individually or the pooled analysis showed a statistically significant benefit of antibiotics prophylaxis over placebo for the outcome considered.

CONCLUSION

The use of antibiotics appears not to be beneficial to prevent infection after hysteroscopy; however, the lack of high-quality studies makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. Considering the very low infection rate highlighted after hysteroscopic procedures, a difference will probably never be proven in a randomized trial. A larger population and program data to confirm these results are therefore warranted.

Для цитирования: Muzii Ludovico, Donato Violante Di, Tucci Chiara Di, Pinto Anna Di, Cascialli Gianluca, Monti Marco, Patacchiola Felice, Benedetti Panici Pierluigi. Efficacy of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Hysteroscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.