Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2020
Histological assessment of the effects of teriparatide therapy on mandibular fracture healing: A preclinical study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zandi Mohammad, Dehghan Arash, Bigonah Nemat, Doulati Shideh, Mohammad Gholi Mezerji Naser
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of teriparatide therapy on mandibular fracture healing in a rat model.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A unilateral mandibular fracture, 5 mm posterior to the last molar tooth, was surgically created in 120 rats. Half of the animals received a daily subcutaneous injection of 2 μg/kg teriparatide while the control rats received normal saline, starting from the day of surgery until sacrifice. Twenty rats from each group were sacrificed on postoperative days 10, 20, and 30. The healing process was evaluated histologically and scored using a grading system (ranging from 1 to 10).
RESULTS: On day 10 the fracture gaps of the control and teriparatide groups were mainly filled with fibrous tissue and new trabecular bone, respectively. On day 20 a large amount of new trabecular bone and some areas of fibrocartilaginous tissue were seen in the fracture gaps of the control rats. In the teriparatide group the fracture area was entirely filled with trabecular bone, which in some areas had been replaced by mature bone. On day 30 the fracture gaps of the control group were entirely bridged by new trabecular bone, while in the teriparatide group they was predominantly filled with mature bone. At all three time-points the mean healing scores for the teriparatide group (6.20 ± 0.70, 8.50 ± 0.69, and 9.85 ± 0.37, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than for the control group (4.90 ± 0.55, 7.15 ± 0.59, and 8.90 ± 0.64, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, teriparatide should be tested in humans in order to establish whether comparable results can be achieved.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A unilateral mandibular fracture, 5 mm posterior to the last molar tooth, was surgically created in 120 rats. Half of the animals received a daily subcutaneous injection of 2 μg/kg teriparatide while the control rats received normal saline, starting from the day of surgery until sacrifice. Twenty rats from each group were sacrificed on postoperative days 10, 20, and 30. The healing process was evaluated histologically and scored using a grading system (ranging from 1 to 10).
RESULTS: On day 10 the fracture gaps of the control and teriparatide groups were mainly filled with fibrous tissue and new trabecular bone, respectively. On day 20 a large amount of new trabecular bone and some areas of fibrocartilaginous tissue were seen in the fracture gaps of the control rats. In the teriparatide group the fracture area was entirely filled with trabecular bone, which in some areas had been replaced by mature bone. On day 30 the fracture gaps of the control group were entirely bridged by new trabecular bone, while in the teriparatide group they was predominantly filled with mature bone. At all three time-points the mean healing scores for the teriparatide group (6.20 ± 0.70, 8.50 ± 0.69, and 9.85 ± 0.37, respectively) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than for the control group (4.90 ± 0.55, 7.15 ± 0.59, and 8.90 ± 0.64, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, teriparatide should be tested in humans in order to establish whether comparable results can be achieved.