MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.12.002

Медицинская библиотека · Indian heart journal · 2025

Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Srivastava Manyata, Gulia Annu, Patel Kamalesh Kumar, Upadhyay Ashish Datt, Vibha Deepti, Kumar Pradeep

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), including valvular (VAF) and non-valvular (NVAF). This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of different DOACs versus VKAs in patients with AF.

METHODS

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % credible intervals (CrIs).

RESULTS

43 RCTs were included (30 VAF, 13 NVAF). Dabigatran (OR 0.77, 95 % CrI 0.68-0.87) demonstrated the strongest reduction in ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, followed by apixaban (0.81, 0.73-0.91). All DOACs were associated with reduced risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

CONCLUSION

DOACs, particularly apixaban and dabigatran, showed superior efficacy and safety compared with VKAs, with apixaban emerging as the most favorable overall option. However, these findings are derived from indirect rather than direct head-to-head comparisons among DOACs and VKAs and should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Для цитирования: Srivastava Manyata, Gulia Annu, Patel Kamalesh Kumar, Upadhyay Ashish Datt, Vibha Deepti, Kumar Pradeep. Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis of randomized trials.. Indian heart journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.12.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.