Pediatric and Juvenile Strabismus Surgery Under General Anesthesia: Functional Outcomes and Safety.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the safety of surgical intervention using anesthesia and ophthalmological parameters in pediatric strabismus patients. The design involved retrospective case series. Methods: The setting was the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna, Austria. Participants: In total, 208 children aged 0-18 years who underwent strabismus surgery due to exotropia or esotropia between 2013 and 2020 were included. Main outcomes and measures: Information regarding the duration of surgery, intra- and postoperative complications, the postoperative angle of deviation (AoD), and functional outcomes (visual acuity, stereovision) were analyzed. Results: The mean age at the time of surgery was 6.0 ± 4.1 years (range 0.6-18.0). The mean anesthesia time among all patients was 75.9 ± 19.3 min. The mean surgery and anesthesia time did not differ between the age groups. Longer anesthesia durations and surgery durations did not have a significant effect on the occurrence of intraoperation complications (p = 0.610 and p = 0.190, respectively). Intraoperative complications were recorded in 53% (most frequent triggering of oculocardiac reflex (OCR)) of the patients, and postoperative complications in 22% (the most frequent were postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain). An OCR was triggered more often in children older than 6 years than in younger children (p = 0.016). The mean angle of deviation was significantly reduced from preoperative to postoperative measurements. Preoperative stereovision tests were positive in 35% of the patients and increased to over 80% postoperatively. Conclusions: Strabismus surgery performed under general anesthesia in children aged 0 to 18 years is safe with regard to both surgical and anesthetic complications. A significant decrease in the angle of deviation and high rate of stereovision could be achieved with a low rate of re-treatments. However, the retrospective design, absence of standardized documentation, and limited sample size may affect the consistency and comparability of this study's findings.