Journal of pediatric surgery · 2004
The effect of common origin of the carotid arteries in neurologic outcome after neonatal ECMO.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lamers Luke J, Rowland Daniel G, Seguin John H, Rosenberg Ellen M, Reber Kristina M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Common origin of the carotid arteries (COCA) is a normal anatomic variant reported to occur in approximately 11% of the general population. The objective of this study was to determine whether this variant places venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients at a higher risk for adverse neurologic sequelae owing to potential occlusion of both carotid arteries by the arterial cannula.
METHODS: The authors reviewed clinical records and echocardiograms of the initial 220 ECMO patients at their institution. Aortic arch morphology was determined by a pediatric cardiologist blinded to all other data. After exclusion of predetermined patients, 131 patients were divided into 2 groups: those with separate origin of the carotid arteries (n = 111) and those with COCA (n = 20). The neurologic outcome variables studied included the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); computed tomography (CT); electroencephalogram (EEG); brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER), head ultrasound scan, and Bayley Scales of Infant Development reported as Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) and Mental Developmental Index (MDI).
RESULTS: COCA had no predictive value in determining PDI and MDI outcomes and no significance in predicting an increased risk of adverse neurologic sequelae based on MRI, CT, EEG, BAER, or head ultrasound scan.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that COCA is a common aortic arch variant (15%, n = 20 of 131) and that this variant does not appear to increase the risk of neurologic injury in infants undergoing venoarterial ECMO.
METHODS: The authors reviewed clinical records and echocardiograms of the initial 220 ECMO patients at their institution. Aortic arch morphology was determined by a pediatric cardiologist blinded to all other data. After exclusion of predetermined patients, 131 patients were divided into 2 groups: those with separate origin of the carotid arteries (n = 111) and those with COCA (n = 20). The neurologic outcome variables studied included the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); computed tomography (CT); electroencephalogram (EEG); brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER), head ultrasound scan, and Bayley Scales of Infant Development reported as Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) and Mental Developmental Index (MDI).
RESULTS: COCA had no predictive value in determining PDI and MDI outcomes and no significance in predicting an increased risk of adverse neurologic sequelae based on MRI, CT, EEG, BAER, or head ultrasound scan.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that COCA is a common aortic arch variant (15%, n = 20 of 131) and that this variant does not appear to increase the risk of neurologic injury in infants undergoing venoarterial ECMO.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Brachiocephalic TrunkBrain Damage, ChronicCarotid ArteriesCatheterizationElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationGenetic VariationHumansHypoxia, BrainInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsPredictive Value of TestsPsychomotor DisordersRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesRiskSingle-Blind MethodTomography, X-Ray Computed