MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11571-022-09790-6

Медицинская библиотека · Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022

Conflicts influence affects: an FMRI study of emotional effects in a conflict task.

Cheung Ho Kwan, Anderson Amanda J, King Eden B, Mahabir Bhindai, Warner Karyn, Jones Kristen P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Although prior research has confirmed that conflict itself is likely to be aversive, it is unclear whether and how emotional conflicts influence an individual's affective processing. The current fMRI study adopted a lexical valence conflict task via instructing participants to shift lexical valence or not. We found that the involvement of positive emotions enhanced the activation of the middle right temporal gyrus (R-MTG) in the non-conflict condition, whereas such activation attenuated in the conflict condition. In addition, the R-MTG was activated in the opposite way when negative emotions were involved. The functional connectivity and correlation analyses further revealed that the faster the participants processed positive emotional words, the weaker the connectivity between R-MTG and positive emotion-related areas of left MTG in the non-conflict condition would be. In contrast, the faster the participants processed negative emotional words, the stronger the connectivity between R-MTG and negative emotion-related areas of the right cerebellum in the conflict condition would become. These findings suggest that conflicts have different influences on emotional processing.

Для цитирования: Cheung Ho Kwan, Anderson Amanda J, King Eden B, Mahabir Bhindai, Warner Karyn, Jones Kristen P. Conflicts influence affects: an FMRI study of emotional effects in a conflict task.. Cognitive neurodynamics. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-022-09790-6.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.