MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/014107680409700303

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2004

Risk factors in acquired faecal incontinence.

Lunniss Peter J, Gladman Marc A, Hetzer Franc H, Williams Norman S, Scott S Mark

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Acquired faecal incontinence arising in the non-elderly population is a common and often devastating condition. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis in 629 patients (475 female) referred to a tertiary centre, to determine the relative importance of individual risk factors in the development of faecal incontinence, as demonstrated by abnormal results on physiological testing. Potential risk factors were identified in all but 6% of patients (7 female, 32 male). In women, the principal risk factor was childbirth (91%), and in most cases at least one vaginal delivery had met with complications such as perineal injury or the need for forceps delivery. Of the males, half had undergone anal surgery and this was the only identified risk factor in 59%. In many instances, assignment of cause was hampered by a long interval between the supposed precipitating event and the development of symptoms. Abnormalities of anorectal physiology were identified in 76% of males and 96% of females (in whom they were more commonly multiple). These findings add to evidence that occult damage to the continence mechanism, especially through vaginal delivery and anal surgery, can result in subsequent faecal incontinence, sometimes after an interval of many years.

Для цитирования: Lunniss Peter J, Gladman Marc A, Hetzer Franc H, Williams Norman S, Scott S Mark. Risk factors in acquired faecal incontinence.. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/014107680409700303.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.